<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History of the World - Balance of Power Variant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/game-articles/history-of-the-world-balance-of-power-variant/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/game-articles/history-of-the-world-balance-of-power-variant</link>
	<description>Game Reviews, House Rules, Strategy, Game Design and more!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/game-articles/history-of-the-world-balance-of-power-variant#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/game-articles/history-of-the-world-balance-of-power-variant#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>We have tried this variant with four and five players and both games came out pretty well.  The games were down to the wire with the Preeminence Markers mattering a lot and making things pretty exciting right up to the end.  

In our last game we again saw the problem where a player that starts off doing too well gets beat up pretty bad and then dosn't win but that happened in the old rules and feels like less of a problem than some of the other things we have been trying to fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have tried this variant with four and five players and both games came out pretty well.  The games were down to the wire with the Preeminence Markers mattering a lot and making things pretty exciting right up to the end.  </p>
<p>In our last game we again saw the problem where a player that starts off doing too well gets beat up pretty bad and then dosn&#8217;t win but that happened in the old rules and feels like less of a problem than some of the other things we have been trying to fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
