<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magic Online &#8211; Eventide Release and a Brief Look at Economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-online-eventide-release-and-a-brief-look-at-economics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-online-eventide-release-and-a-brief-look-at-economics</link>
	<description>Game Reviews, House Rules, Strategy, Game Design, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-online-eventide-release-and-a-brief-look-at-economics/comment-page-1#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/?p=187#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s interesting is that Wizards is, as the &quot;traditional&quot; gaming industry goes, a big company. Yet they are making plenty of missteps along the way as they try to put their games online, some of which might suggest they&#039;re not allocating the resources necessary to make these projects successful, and some indicate that they just don&#039;t have a very good grasp of business and gaming online.

Of course they&#039;re being pretty open about some of their blunders, and while that makes them an easy target I find that honesty and openness refreshing and it makes me want to give them the benefit of the doubt.

I think that they might do well to take a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ccpgames.com/company/merger.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cue from White Wolf&lt;/a&gt; and partner with (or acquire?) someone who has proven they know what they&#039;re doing in the online space. As more of Wizards&#039; product line heads in that direction they stand to continue making these kind of mistakes without clear leadership to navigate these unfamiliar (to them) waters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that Wizards is, as the &#8220;traditional&#8221; gaming industry goes, a big company. Yet they are making plenty of missteps along the way as they try to put their games online, some of which might suggest they&#8217;re not allocating the resources necessary to make these projects successful, and some indicate that they just don&#8217;t have a very good grasp of business and gaming online.</p>
<p>Of course they&#8217;re being pretty open about some of their blunders, and while that makes them an easy target I find that honesty and openness refreshing and it makes me want to give them the benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p>I think that they might do well to take a <a href="http://www.ccpgames.com/company/merger.asp" rel="nofollow">cue from White Wolf</a> and partner with (or acquire?) someone who has proven they know what they&#8217;re doing in the online space. As more of Wizards&#8217; product line heads in that direction they stand to continue making these kind of mistakes without clear leadership to navigate these unfamiliar (to them) waters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-online-eventide-release-and-a-brief-look-at-economics/comment-page-1#comment-1932</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/?p=187#comment-1932</guid>
		<description>I added &quot;Edit: To clarify, paper cards are (in general) worth a lot more than virtual cards.  This is why getting a full collection together was a viable way for a group of people to make money.  Without these individuals and their incentive to make money the economy of Magic Online suffers.&quot;

To try to clarify my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added &#8220;Edit: To clarify, paper cards are (in general) worth a lot more than virtual cards.  This is why getting a full collection together was a viable way for a group of people to make money.  Without these individuals and their incentive to make money the economy of Magic Online suffers.&#8221;</p>
<p>To try to clarify my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
