<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magic the Gathering – Spotlight on Reach of Branches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches</link>
	<description>Game Reviews, House Rules, Strategy, Game Design and more!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1955</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-%e2%80%93-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1955</guid>
		<description>i have a treefolk deck that's phenomenal it only need's 7 new cards to be the sh*t e-mail me for the list at ry7737@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a treefolk deck that&#8217;s phenomenal it only need&#8217;s 7 new cards to be the sh*t e-mail me for the list at <a href="mailto:ry7737@yahoo.com">ry7737@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-%e2%80%93-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>Honestly it was bad luck.  My draws looked good (I sometimes keep bad draws because I hate to mulligan but that was not the case here) but then didn't pan out.  One of them had three lands but then I drew only two more spells in the next ten cards and the other just wasn't what I needed when I needed it.  

In drafts I sometimes do well and I sometimes don't.  I was on a high streek for a bit but lately I have been getting a lot of 2nd and 4th place finishes as well as my share of bomb outs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly it was bad luck.  My draws looked good (I sometimes keep bad draws because I hate to mulligan but that was not the case here) but then didn&#8217;t pan out.  One of them had three lands but then I drew only two more spells in the next ten cards and the other just wasn&#8217;t what I needed when I needed it.  </p>
<p>In drafts I sometimes do well and I sometimes don&#8217;t.  I was on a high streek for a bit but lately I have been getting a lot of 2nd and 4th place finishes as well as my share of bomb outs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-%e2%80%93-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>Out of curiosity, what do you think was the biggest flaw? Slow?

&lt;em&gt;(Not that fourth place is horrible, but I know you frequently place higher.)&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiosity, what do you think was the biggest flaw? Slow?</p>
<p><em>(Not that fourth place is horrible, but I know you frequently place higher.)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-%e2%80%93-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>I should mention that I played another Treefolk deck in a draft that had a lot of powerfull cards and looked amazing on paper (it actually included Reach as well) but I ended up coming in fourth place with it.  It was kind of sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should mention that I played another Treefolk deck in a draft that had a lot of powerfull cards and looked amazing on paper (it actually included Reach as well) but I ended up coming in fourth place with it.  It was kind of sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-%e2%80%93-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>So, I decided to try to play Treefolk and ended up with what I considered a rather poor deck.  No real bombs other than the Witch (which isn't even THAT much of a bomb and since only about half the deck ended up actually being Treefolk it wasn't even a total bomb) and a lot of mediocre cards over all.  Still I can't complain since I ended up coming in first... A whole pile of tough bodies can really carry a deck sometimes I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I decided to try to play Treefolk and ended up with what I considered a rather poor deck.  No real bombs other than the Witch (which isn&#8217;t even THAT much of a bomb and since only about half the deck ended up actually being Treefolk it wasn&#8217;t even a total bomb) and a lot of mediocre cards over all.  Still I can&#8217;t complain since I ended up coming in first&#8230; A whole pile of tough bodies can really carry a deck sometimes I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/gaming-news/magic-the-gathering-%e2%80%93-spotlight-on-reach-of-branches#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>I don't know about draft, generally being a non-drafter myself, but for the small league I'm playing in I currently have at least one deck canvasing almost any given Lorwyn creature type... except Treefolk. My Treefolk card pool isn't great to begin with, and aside from being tough I can't seem to get them to, well, &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; anything (other than the aforementioned "being tough" which somehow doesn't seem enough).

Though I have seen a couple Treefolk abilities which make such a deck look desirable, such as making the rest of your Treefolk &lt;strong&gt;indestructible&lt;/strong&gt; or kinship which allows them to be &lt;strong&gt;played for free&lt;/strong&gt;. So there's still an outside shot for my as-yet-unmade Treefolk deck, as we open up the remaining league boosters.

Oh, and I almost forgot &lt;span class="mtg"&gt;Weed-Pruner Poplar&lt;/span&gt;... but of course the three of those I own are being put to work in another deck :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about draft, generally being a non-drafter myself, but for the small league I&#8217;m playing in I currently have at least one deck canvasing almost any given Lorwyn creature type&#8230; except Treefolk. My Treefolk card pool isn&#8217;t great to begin with, and aside from being tough I can&#8217;t seem to get them to, well, <em>do</em> anything (other than the aforementioned &#8220;being tough&#8221; which somehow doesn&#8217;t seem enough).</p>
<p>Though I have seen a couple Treefolk abilities which make such a deck look desirable, such as making the rest of your Treefolk <strong>indestructible</strong> or kinship which allows them to be <strong>played for free</strong>. So there&#8217;s still an outside shot for my as-yet-unmade Treefolk deck, as we open up the remaining league boosters.</p>
<p>Oh, and I almost forgot <span class="mtg">Weed-Pruner Poplar</span>&#8230; but of course the three of those I own are being put to work in another deck <img src='http://games-blog.pairodicegames.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
